"Seaweed farming can be a double-edged sword. ... it’s an important livelihood; but careless farming can damage reefs..."

Species Spotlight

This tiny seahorse - 2cm tall - is protected in Australian waters.   It is only found on gorgorgian corals.

Featured Resource

During the last decade, forest certification has gained momentum as a market-based conservation strategy in tropical forest countries. Certification has been promoted to enhance forest management in...

Spatial and temporal variation of abundance, biomass and diversity within marine reserves in the Philippines

TitleSpatial and temporal variation of abundance, biomass and diversity within marine reserves in the Philippines
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2010
AuthorsAnticamara, JA, Zeller D, Vincent ACJ
JournalDiversity and Distributions
Volume16
Issue4
Pagination529 - 536
Date Published07/2010
KeywordsBiodiversity, conservation, marine protected areas, no-take zones, overfishing, small-scale fisheries
Abstract

Aim  The objective of this study was to investigate the influence of protection duration (years of fishing closure) and location (distance from shore) on reef fish diversity.

Location  Danajon Double Barrier Reef, Bohol, Philippines.

Methods  Reef fish abundance and size structure, by species, were obtained monthly using replicated underwater visual belt transects (n = 8; 70 × 5-m belt transects) over 3 years (2002–2005) at eight sites that included six marine reserves and two unprotected reef areas. We analysed species accumulation curves, diversity indices and abundance–biomass comparison (ABC) curves within and across the study sites to assess the influence of protection duration and location.

Results  Analyses showed that longer protection duration impacted reef fish diversity at both inshore and offshore sites by shifting ABC curves from higher abundance than biomass curves at fished sites to higher biomass than abundance curves at most of the protected sites. Protection duration did not significantly influence either the rate of species accumulation within sites or the 12 diversity indices measured across the study sites. The offshore sites consistently showed higher rates of species accumulation and diversity indices values than inshore sites with similar protection duration. One protected offshore young marine reserve site that has been assessed as the least well-managed showed patterns more consistent with the fished sites.

Main conclusions  Analyses showed that protection duration mainly impacted diversity by increasing the dominance of large-bodied species and enhancing total biomass. Besides protection duration, reserve location influenced species accumulation curves and diversity indices.

DOI10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00661.x